Absorbable Suture Monosyn® Quick – The fast one

Product Quick Finder

Choose a category or subcategory

Fast and monofilament

Monosyn® Quick is a short term resorbable and monofilament suture material. Due to its short resorption time, Monosyn® Quick is used in veterinary practices and clinics, especially in dental surgery and for sutures of the mucosa. With its good elasticity and flexibility in combination with reliable knotability, Monosyn® Quick is particularly well suited for wounds which require only short support.

E- Learning Module and White Papers

Don't miss out on new content such as whitepapers, videos, events and more.

Get Access To Our Educational Resources

Indications

  • Intracutaneous skin closure
  • Gynaecology, urology
  • Dental surgery

Properties and features

  • Easy handling
  • Quick absorption
  • High knot pull tensile strength
  • Good flexibility and elongation

Structure:Monofilament, uncoated
Chemical compositionGylconate
Diameter:USP 6/0 - USP 1
Colour:undyed
Absorption time:~ 6 - 7 days
Knot tensile strength retention:~ 6 - 7 days p. i. 50 %
Mass absorption:~ 56 days

The monofilament advantages

  • The monofilament sutures appear to have the lowest infection promoting effects [1-4]
  • Compared with braided multifilament sutures, absorbable monofilaments exhibit less tissue drag and cause less tearing because of their smooth surfaces [5]

Tensile strength retention of the B. Braun synthetic suture for fast healing tissues

Monosyn® Quick: Short term absorbable suture for fast healing tissues.

Monosyn®: Mid term absorbable suture for soft tissue approximation.

MonoPlus®: Long term absorbable suture designed for slow healing tissues.

B. Braun offers a comprehensive synthetic absorbable monofilament portfolio.

[1] Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97-132.
[2] Choi HJ, Chae HD. Comparison of E. Coli infiltration between new synthetic absorbable sutures. J Korean Surg Soc. 2009;77(1):1-6.
[3] Buresch A, Van Arsdale A, Ferzli M, Bernstein P, Garry D, Ngai I. Comparison of subcuticular suture type in post-cesarean wound complications: A randomized controlled trial American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;216:1 Supplement 1 (S25).
[4] Won H-S, Lee S-W, Kim Y-M, Kim A. Clinical usefulness and safety of the anti-bacterial coated multi lament suture (Vicryl Plus®) and mono lament suture (Monosyn®) in hysterectomy BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012;119 SUPPL. 1 (44)
[5] Im JN, Kim JK, Kim HK, Lee KY, Park WH. Characteristics of novel monofilament sutures prepared by conjugate spinning. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;83(2): 499-504.